|
Prov. B
Oct 20, 2024 7:13:15 GMT -6
via mobile
Post by Senior hockey fan on Oct 20, 2024 7:13:15 GMT -6
Do you think there will ever be a provincial B category again I would like to see it again more opportunities for different teams
|
|
|
Post by dannyrojas on Oct 20, 2024 7:18:16 GMT -6
Do you think there will ever be a provincial B category again I would like to see it again more opportunities for different teams if anything they will change the populations I can’t see them going A C D every year
|
|
|
Prov. B
Oct 21, 2024 7:22:55 GMT -6
via mobile
Post by Observer 7 on Oct 21, 2024 7:22:55 GMT -6
I hope they get senior B back and going make wht ever changes that are needed we need all 4 brackets it’s more interesting and more options for the teams for sure may have to up the import allowed a bit and population to try to get atleast a dozen teams to enter
|
|
|
Post by hugehorn on Oct 21, 2024 8:10:17 GMT -6
I hope they get senior B back and going make wht ever changes that are needed we need all 4 brackets it’s more interesting and more options for the teams for sure may have to up the import allowed a bit and population to try to get atleast a dozen teams to enter B division should be 5 imports, while C/D remains 3 (& A is wide open).
|
|
|
Prov. B
Oct 23, 2024 10:25:57 GMT -6
via mobile
Post by Long cold nights on Oct 23, 2024 10:25:57 GMT -6
I hope they get senior B back and going make wht ever changes that are needed we need all 4 brackets it’s more interesting and more options for the teams for sure may have to up the import allowed a bit and population to try to get atleast a dozen teams to enter B division should be 5 imports, while C/D remains 3 (& A is wide open). Senior must be in rough shape if we can’t even get a b division
|
|
|
Post by hugehorn on Oct 23, 2024 16:47:17 GMT -6
B division should be 5 imports, while C/D remains 3 (& A is wide open). Senior must be in rough shape if we can’t even get a b division The current setup has basically wiped out the B Division: D = <3,500 population, + 3 or fewer imports C = <3,500 population, + 3 or fewer imports B = <5,000 population, + 3 or fewer imports A = >5,000 population, open import spots That's a pretty narrow band there for the B Division to exist within. Seems the overwhelming majority of teams qualify for C or A, not inbetween. If the setup made a minor change on imports, say to this: D = <3,500 population, + 3 or fewer imports C = <3,500 population, + 3 or fewer imports B = <5,000 population, + 5 or fewer imports A = >5,000 population, open import spots you'd have seen atleast half a dozen teams who were in that crowded A division (5 friggin rounds!) last year as entered into the B division instead - cause they'd now qualify for it. Then on the otherside of the B bracket, you'd also see teams stop dropping an import or two to avoid A - they'd just enter B instead as they'd now qualify. Kyle did this couple years ago when they dropped Doerksen for provincials because he was their 4th import - that 1 player was the difference between them qualifying for D (they won that year) or being forced to go A, which is pretty ridiculous that there is no inbetween option.
|
|
|
Post by ppbluesfan24 on Oct 23, 2024 16:55:27 GMT -6
Senior must be in rough shape if we can’t even get a b division The current setup has basically wiped out the B Division: D = <3,500 population, + 3 or fewer imports C = <3,500 population, + 3 or fewer imports B = <5,000 population, + 3 or fewer imports A = >5,000 population, open import spots That's a pretty narrow band there for the B Division to exist within. Seems the overwhelming majority of teams qualify for C or A, not inbetween. If the setup made a minor change on imports, say to this: D = <3,500 population, + 3 or fewer imports C = <3,500 population, + 3 or fewer imports B = <5,000 population, + 5 or fewer imports A = >5,000 population, open import spots you'd have seen atleast half a dozen teams who were in that crowded A division (5 friggin rounds!) last year as entered into the B division instead - cause they'd now qualify for it. Then on the otherside of the B bracket, you'd also see teams stop dropping an import or two to avoid A - they'd just enter B instead as they'd now qualify. Kyle did this couple years ago when they dropped Doerksen for provincials because he was their 4th import - that 1 player was the difference between them qualifying for D (they won that year) or being forced to go A, which is pretty ridiculous that there is no inbetween option. impeccable write up. Provincials definitely need to be re-worked.
|
|
|
Post by hugehorn on Oct 23, 2024 22:39:50 GMT -6
So that’s the difference between D and A, as it stands currently. 1 player. In that Kyle example from the 22-23 season, if Doerksen is out, they’re D (they did this and won). If Doerksen is in, they have to go A.
Shouldn’t be that way… It should be a progression, not only in terms of population but in imports as well. Gives teams some options, and keeps each bracket full.
If you look at the Sask Valley for example, it’s a B league, and ironically none of the teams go B division. SV allows 5 imports (no “non-imports”/grandfathered). If a SV team has 5 imports, with 2 qualifying as “non-import” by HockeySask standards, they go C division. If a SV team has 5 imports, with only 1 qualifying as “non-import” by HockeySask standards, they must go A. B division never enters the picture.
B isn’t a thing, the way HockeySask has the current rules designed. Teams are either C or A. If a middle ground existed, there’d be a few teams at minimum from the Sask Valley alone that would enter the B bracket.
|
|
|
Prov. B
Oct 23, 2024 23:06:45 GMT -6
via mobile
Post by Thinktank on Oct 23, 2024 23:06:45 GMT -6
I honestly wish it was a little more like Manitoba. Only way to get to provincials is if you win your league. That would give us the true best teams in the province. Not sure why it isn’t talked about more actually.
Also the league champs get to pick from the crop of the league to add I think 3 affiliate players for the provincial run. Not sure if it’s like tournament format or what but I think that would be awesome.
Or do we love the super team action we get now? I think this would be equally good.
|
|
|
Post by hugehorn on Oct 23, 2024 23:10:41 GMT -6
No offense but, might be the worst suggestion I’ve ever heard.
|
|
|
Post by johnnywhitehog on Oct 23, 2024 23:14:07 GMT -6
D = 3 imports C = 4 imports B = 5 imports A = unlimited
|
|
|
Post by doncherry10 on Oct 23, 2024 23:16:48 GMT -6
I honestly wish it was a little more like Manitoba. Only way to get to provincials is if you win your league. That would give us the true best teams in the province. Not sure why it isn’t talked about more actually. Also the league champs get to pick from the crop of the league to add I think 3 affiliate players for the provincial run. Not sure if it’s like tournament format or what but I think that would be awesome. Or do we love the super team action we get now? I think this would be equally good. We need more teams entering provincials, not less. Regardless of how good the team is, small towns will pack the rink to watch their local team in provincials. What they need to do is change the formats so there is a division that allows for smaller, primarily local teams to be competitive.
|
|
|
Post by hugehorn on Oct 23, 2024 23:17:26 GMT -6
D = 3 imports C = 4 imports B = 5 imports A = unlimited Fantastic. I’d even take: D = 2 imports C = 3 imports B = 4 imports A = unlimited Just some sort of progression. It’s all it’d take to revive the B division and keep all the brackets full.
|
|
|
Post by dufe92 on Oct 24, 2024 4:28:26 GMT -6
D = 3 imports C = 4 imports B = 5 imports A = unlimited 5 imports for B would be perfect. If this isn’t changed, the B division is dead
|
|
|
Post by Cake Eater on Oct 24, 2024 12:26:03 GMT -6
I honestly wish it was a little more like Manitoba. Only way to get to provincials is if you win your league. That would give us the true best teams in the province. Not sure why it isn’t talked about more actually. Also the league champs get to pick from the crop of the league to add I think 3 affiliate players for the provincial run. Not sure if it’s like tournament format or what but I think that would be awesome. Or do we love the super team action we get now? I think this would be equally good. I would argue that Manitoba provincials needs to be more like Saskatchewan
|
|