|
|
Prov. B
Oct 24, 2024 12:32:16 GMT -6
Post by Curious George on Oct 24, 2024 12:32:16 GMT -6
D = 3 imports C = 4 imports B = 5 imports A = unlimited 5 imports for B would be perfect. If this isn’t changed, the B division is dead Under the current rules you're allowed 5 imports - 3 imports and 2 non-imports for B, C and D. Are you suggesting 3 imports for D and no non-imports and 4 total for C with also no allowance for non imports? The issue I see is imports jumping around for more money or whatever the reason is. The non-import rule was brought in to attempt tp stop that but it isn't working anymore. What's wrong with getting rid of the 2 non-imports and going with 5 imports for B, C and D and having teams divided up by population? |
|
|
|
Post by hugehorn on Oct 24, 2024 12:57:45 GMT -6
Should be a higher import allowance for B than D. Otherwise if all of B/C/D have the same import allowance, then the difference between an A team and a D team is literally 1 player.
|
|
|
|
Prov. B
Oct 24, 2024 13:40:48 GMT -6
Post by Curious George on Oct 24, 2024 13:40:48 GMT -6
Why should a team that falls into the D population bracket not be allowed 5 imports?
The smaller centers should be allowed more imports than the larger ones as they have less people to draw from.
And not sure where you get 1 player difference from an A team to a D team? I haven't seen a team enter into A with only 6 imports
|
|
|
|
Post by hugehorn on Oct 24, 2024 14:08:01 GMT -6
And not sure where you get 1 player difference from an A team to a D team? I haven't seen a team enter into A with only 6 imports Because if you have <3500 population and 3 imports, you qualify for C (which then gets split into C + D, based on how many teams enter and their populations). Now add 1 import to that roster - puts that team at 4 imports. Only bracket you qualify for now is A. |
|
|
|
Post by zambonidriver on Oct 24, 2024 16:48:28 GMT -6
D = 3 imports C = 4 imports B = 5 imports A = unlimited 5 imports for B would be perfect. If this isn’t changed, the B division is dead couldn't agree more.. there would be a lot of teams that would shoot for B instead of the free for all that is A. |
|
|
|
Prov. B
Nov 12, 2024 19:35:40 GMT -6
via mobile
Post by goals on Nov 12, 2024 19:35:40 GMT -6
SAHA can be blamed for wrecking PROV hockey.
This is sustainable:
AAA Wide Open NEW can play in 2 categories
A up to 10 Imports RULE
B up to 4 Imports RULE
C up to 4 Imports RULE
D up to 4 Imports RULE
Population?.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Accountant on Nov 13, 2024 16:34:17 GMT -6
I honestly wish it was a little more like Manitoba. Only way to get to provincials is if you win your league. That would give us the true best teams in the province. Not sure why it isn’t talked about more actually. Also the league champs get to pick from the crop of the league to add I think 3 affiliate players for the provincial run. Not sure if it’s like tournament format or what but I think that would be awesome. Or do we love the super team action we get now? I think this would be equally good. No offence intended, but if you think this would "give us the true best teams in the province" then I have to suggest you have not thought the concept completely through. |
|
|
|
Post by saskytransfer on Nov 13, 2024 19:44:42 GMT -6
I honestly wish it was a little more like Manitoba. Only way to get to provincials is if you win your league. That would give us the true best teams in the province. Not sure why it isn’t talked about more actually. Also the league champs get to pick from the crop of the league to add I think 3 affiliate players for the provincial run. Not sure if it’s like tournament format or what but I think that would be awesome. Or do we love the super team action we get now? I think this would be equally good. No offence intended, but if you think this would "give us the true best teams in the province" then I have to suggest you have not thought the concept completely through. Especially when Manitoba only has two leagues. Lol |
|
|
|
Post by connoisseur on Nov 13, 2024 21:32:48 GMT -6
No offence intended, but if you think this would "give us the true best teams in the province" then I have to suggest you have not thought the concept completely through. Especially when Manitoba only has two leagues. Lol Yup. Provincials are very important to towns. Even teams that get bounced in the first round rely on provincials to keep people interested and dollars coming in to the team and rink. |
|
|
|
Post by zambonidriver on Nov 15, 2024 15:24:23 GMT -6
No offence intended, but if you think this would "give us the true best teams in the province" then I have to suggest you have not thought the concept completely through. Especially when Manitoba only has two leagues. Lol was chatting with a colleague from MB yesterday and we were talking senior. He used to play a few years ago and i was explaining how many teams and leagues there are in SK he was blown away. |
|
|
|
Post by saskytransfer on Nov 15, 2024 15:49:39 GMT -6
Especially when Manitoba only has two leagues. Lol was chatting with a colleague from MB yesterday and we were talking senior. He used to play a few years ago and i was explaining how many teams and leagues there are in SK he was blown away. The collapse of senior in Manitoba is sad as hell. They've had something like 5 leagues fold the last 10-15 years |
|
|
|
Prov. B
Nov 15, 2024 16:36:02 GMT -6
via mobile
Post by johnnywhitehog on Nov 15, 2024 16:36:02 GMT -6
Why is that Saskytransfer?
|
|
