|
|
Post by yardsale on Feb 10, 2024 22:14:04 GMT -6
They have 8, and one that played AHL. No Tkatch tonight.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cheeseburgerr on Feb 10, 2024 22:27:50 GMT -6
They have 8, and one that played AHL. No Tkatch tonight. And there excited to win D |
|
|
|
Post by guestt on Feb 10, 2024 22:34:06 GMT -6
They have 8, and one that played AHL. No Tkatch tonight. 7 forwards and 1 D-man who have played in the last 5 years. |
|
|
|
Post by Cheesburgger on Feb 10, 2024 22:41:40 GMT -6
Pirates blow, if Lamont was there they win.
|
|
|
|
Post by HockeyDad on Feb 11, 2024 0:01:01 GMT -6
Lanigan outworked Keneston for the first period. Pirates need to burry a few and capitalize on pp chances. Stadnyck 3 minor penalties and complains about each one. Shhhstandard. Shields played excellent.
|
|
|
|
Post by anonymous369 on Feb 11, 2024 0:09:18 GMT -6
C and D are nothing compared to A, completely different level. You can stroke yourselves off all you want about dressing 8 ex cis guys, every team with a shot at A besides Wadena has at least one import goalie and 4-5 d men who have played junior or better on their provincial roster. On top of having their own 6+ forwards getting paid. Kenaston and Lanigan will be a decent series, wouldn’t be shocked to see shields steal at least one game. So those years Drake was a D power along with Conquest in the 90's was nothing? You'll have to remove alot of banners above the players benches in the Drake Sportsplex given they mean nothing. Drake in the last 10 seasons won another D title, should that be removed as well? And you're talking in circles re: Kenaston as they have the talent to compete in A when looking at their lineup. You were probably one of those ones who complained they should man up to A, yet now talk like how they have no chance. Hell you bunch dismissed Wadena's first SHA title in B because it wasn't A (BTW...I have them winning A). Be careful what you wish for...you SHA A fanboys demanded Kenaston go A, they have and will be a tough out for any team in A. Drake won a lot of provincial C and D banners in that time and went 20 years between league titles also. For the majority of those banner years they weren’t the best team in their own league, other teams won B or A on several of the same years they won C or D. The team that won league and B is a different story…….. |
|
|
|
Post by Senior hockey fan on Feb 11, 2024 0:24:26 GMT -6
Kenaston in 2. They have been the best team in the province for the last 3 years. ‘A’ will be a challenge but Lanigan won’t be it. Kenaston 7-3 and 8-5. That’s quite a statement for a team that won C last year but nothing the previous 2 seasons. Besides that, there are 9 or 10 teams dressing a lineup with comparable depth and almost every one of them has better D and at least one better goalie. Didn't Kenaston win prov the last 2 years??? And the SVHl?? And the year before that was C19 when they were probably one of the favorites to win SHA and SVHL. And as for Kenaston's defence as I see they have 1- pro europe 1- ECHL 1 - CIS 2 - Jr A 1- Jr B |
|
|
|
Post by rr11 on Feb 11, 2024 1:03:46 GMT -6
So those years Drake was a D power along with Conquest in the 90's was nothing? You'll have to remove alot of banners above the players benches in the Drake Sportsplex given they mean nothing. Drake in the last 10 seasons won another D title, should that be removed as well? And you're talking in circles re: Kenaston as they have the talent to compete in A when looking at their lineup. You were probably one of those ones who complained they should man up to A, yet now talk like how they have no chance. Hell you bunch dismissed Wadena's first SHA title in B because it wasn't A (BTW...I have them winning A). Be careful what you wish for...you SHA A fanboys demanded Kenaston go A, they have and will be a tough out for any team in A. Drake won a lot of provincial C and D banners in that time and went 20 years between league titles also. For the majority of those banner years they weren’t the best team in their own league, other teams won B or A on several of the same years they won C or D. The team that won league and B is a different story…….. We weren't discussing Drake's LLHL success in the 1990's, try to stay on topic: So those years Drake was a D power along with Conquest in the 90's was a bunch of nothing? Drake in the last 10 seasons won another D title, should that one be removed from the Drake Sportsplex along with the D banners from the 1990's? Besides in the last 20 years as you mentioned, only Lanigan entered A with any sort of regularity. LLHL teams traditionally entered B-D much like the SVHL did and currently do. It's only in the last 10 years that LLHL teams enter A due to import rules. So the standard you SHA A fanboys have tried to set is an A banner is the real one vs the B, C or D banner mean nothing. |
|
|
|
Post by Underwater Johnson on Feb 11, 2024 1:07:25 GMT -6
That’s quite a statement for a team that won C last year but nothing the previous 2 seasons. Besides that, there are 9 or 10 teams dressing a lineup with comparable depth and almost every one of them has better D and at least one better goalie. Didn't Kenaston win prov the last 2 years??? And the SVHl?? And the year before that was C19 when they were probably one of the favorites to win SHA and SVHL. And as for Kenaston's defence as I see they have 1- pro europe 1- ECHL 1 - CIS 2 - Jr A 1- Jr B Blizzards also in last years prov run beat LLHL champs Davidson in 2 straight and big six champion Redvers in 2 straight. |
|
|
|
Post by Fan1234 on Feb 11, 2024 1:38:45 GMT -6
Lanigan outworked Keneston for the first period. Pirates need to burry a few and capitalize on pp chances. Stadnyck 3 minor penalties and complains about each one. Shhhstandard. Shields played excellent. 2 minor penalties not 3 idiot |
|
|
|
Post by TH40 on Feb 11, 2024 2:00:55 GMT -6
Drake won a lot of provincial C and D banners in that time and went 20 years between league titles also. For the majority of those banner years they weren’t the best team in their own league, other teams won B or A on several of the same years they won C or D. The team that won league and B is a different story…….. We weren't discussing Drake's LLHL success in the 1990's, try to stay on topic: So those years Drake was a D power along with Conquest in the 90's was a bunch of nothing? Drake in the last 10 seasons won another D title, should that one be removed from the Drake Sportsplex along with the D banners from the 1990's? Besides in the last 20 years as you mentioned, only Lanigan entered A with any sort of regularity. LLHL teams traditionally entered B-D much like the SVHL did and currently do. It's only in the last 10 years that LLHL teams enter A due to import rules. So the standard you SHA A fanboys have tried to set is an A banner is the real one vs the B, C or D banner mean nothing. Wynyard was a team that regularly went A with the same league / prov team and won it in 13. Lately haven’t had as strong as teams so getting pick ups. |
|
|
|
Post by Game summary on Feb 11, 2024 2:28:20 GMT -6
Game summary
1st period
Lanigan was aggressive and out worked Kenaston. Kenaston looked out of sync and had trouble moving the puck. Lanigan did a good job shutting down Kenaston passing in the neutral zone. Shots 12-8 Lanigan, score 1-0 Kenaston. Lanigan had the shot advantage, but Kenaston had better scoring chances.
2nd period
Lanigan started on the PP and was man up for most of the first 8 min of the period. Had some scramble chances in the slot and a few point shot that Peterson didn’t see but still managed to make the save. Kenaston capitalize on their 3rd shot of the period to go up 2-0. And the momentum start to shift to kenaston advantage. Shots in The second 13-11 Lanigan
3rd Period
All Kenaston for most of the period as their forward lines started to find rhythm and took over the game. Lanigan looked tired and Kenaston found the back of the net 2 more times. Total shots was 35-33 in favour of Kenaston.
Summary
Kenaston has 3 solid forward lines with any of them being as good if not better than Lanigan first line. Lanigan played a very good defensive game that kept kenaston in the outside and didn’t allow them many offensive chances in the first 2 periods and kenaston took too many undisciplined penalties that gave Lanigan time in offensive zone, but Lanigan struggled with the man advantage. In goal, Peterson outplayed Shields and earned the shut out!
Game 2 next Saturday should be a good game, but the larger ice surface in Lanigan will be to Kenaston’s advantage and should end the series.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brutes on Feb 11, 2024 7:42:31 GMT -6
I was thinking A might be tough but now thinking Kenaston might roll through A. Gonna be a bit tougher battle but no one gonna beat them twice. Only team in A with three first lines. Gonna take an elite goaltender to win the series for the other team.
|
|
|
|
Post by rr12 on Feb 11, 2024 7:49:04 GMT -6
C and D are nothing compared to A, completely different level. You can stroke yourselves off all you want about dressing 8 ex cis guys, every team with a shot at A besides Wadena has at least one import goalie and 4-5 d men who have played junior or better on their provincial roster. On top of having their own 6+ forwards getting paid. Kenaston and Lanigan will be a decent series, wouldn’t be shocked to see shields steal at least one game. So those years Drake was a D power along with Conquest in the 90's was nothing? You'll have to remove alot of banners above the players benches in the Drake Sportsplex given they mean nothing. Drake in the last 10 seasons won another D title, should that be removed as well? And you're talking in circles re: Kenaston as they have the talent to compete in A when looking at their lineup. You were probably one of those ones who complained they should man up to A, yet now talk like how they have no chance. Hell you bunch dismissed Wadena's first SHA title in B because it wasn't A (BTW...I have them winning A). Be careful what you wish for...you SHA A fanboys demanded Kenaston go A, they have and will be a tough out for any team in A. Nobody is taking away the d banners rr11 relax your mental and making stuff up we know you guzzle all there loads in your mouth making it hard to speak. Just saying if there the best than beat the best which they haven’t done yet in the past 2 years beating lower competition. |
|
|
|
Post by rr11 on Feb 11, 2024 8:46:59 GMT -6
So those years Drake was a D power along with Conquest in the 90's was nothing? You'll have to remove alot of banners above the players benches in the Drake Sportsplex given they mean nothing. Drake in the last 10 seasons won another D title, should that be removed as well? And you're talking in circles re: Kenaston as they have the talent to compete in A when looking at their lineup. You were probably one of those ones who complained they should man up to A, yet now talk like how they have no chance. Hell you bunch dismissed Wadena's first SHA title in B because it wasn't A (BTW...I have them winning A). Be careful what you wish for...you SHA A fanboys demanded Kenaston go A, they have and will be a tough out for any team in A. Nobody is taking away the d banners rr11 relax your mental and making stuff up we know you guzzle all there loads in your mouth making it hard to speak. Just saying if there the best than beat the best which they haven’t done yet in the past 2 years beating lower competition. The only way to definitively determine that is if A, B, C and D winners got together for a round robin (3 games with top two play a one game final) or 2 out of 3 provincial style bracket (A vs C, B vs D then winners play 2 out of 3 final). A no mind like yourself who is unable to spell and articulate an opinion into a coherent thought is not who we should listen to re: to be the best you got to beat the best. |
|
