|
|
Post by Spinachdip on Feb 25, 2022 9:11:51 GMT -6
Well I heard Draude got 2 more games (served in Prov) and the Coach got a 30 day suspension. Which is weird I thought it would be the Manager. Drake trying to pull another fast one.. seems about right. Imagine thinking drake did this intentionally 🤡 seems like an honest mistake and now they have to accept the consequences |
|
|
|
Post by dude99 on Feb 25, 2022 9:29:07 GMT -6
Heard the game sheet was filled out improperly by the officials and Drake was told Draude wouldn’t be suspended by the refs afterwards. SHA are the real clowns in this situation. Has a 5min CFB always been a automatic suspension? I don’t always remember it being that way but I could be wrong
|
|
|
|
Post by Rawdog on Feb 25, 2022 9:31:12 GMT -6
Didn’t this same thing happen with draude when lanigan and warman played in provincials? And they replayed the game as well?
|
|
|
|
Post by impacttripping on Feb 25, 2022 9:50:51 GMT -6
Heard the game sheet was filled out improperly by the officials and Drake was told Draude wouldn’t be suspended by the refs afterwards. SHA are the real clowns in this situation. Has a 5min CFB always been a automatic suspension? I don’t always remember it being that way but I could be wrong Blame the refs all you want but it’s not the refs who decide suspensions. They can barely make a penalty call right let alone rule on a suspension. |
|
|
|
Post by Gunit on Feb 25, 2022 9:55:02 GMT -6
Heard the game sheet was filled out improperly by the officials and Drake was told Draude wouldn’t be suspended by the refs afterwards. SHA are the real clowns in this situation. Has a 5min CFB always been a automatic suspension? I don’t always remember it being that way but I could be wrong That would make sense why they are replaying the game vs a forfeit. |
|
|
|
Post by greaselightning on Feb 25, 2022 10:23:41 GMT -6
From the LLHL website: 'This game will not count, and will be replayed'......mmm interesting?? Generally the only reason for the game to be replayed is if SHA took the blame. So they must have erred in some way. But if they did why is the coach and player suspended for 30 days…. Draude is suspended for 30 days? That’s effectively the rest of the season at this point. |
|
|
|
Post by hockeyguy1 on Feb 25, 2022 10:38:08 GMT -6
Draude's suspension is 1 game needs to be served in a provincial game since in happened in a provincial game. If your league and provincial rosters aren't the same you can't serve a provincial game suspension in a league game .
|
|
|
|
Post by dufe92 on Feb 25, 2022 10:45:23 GMT -6
Didn’t this same thing happen with draude when lanigan and warman played in provincials? And they replayed the game as well? Yes it did, warman had an ineligible player because of suspension so they replayed game three in lanigan |
|
|
|
Post by prairiesentinel on Feb 25, 2022 10:50:32 GMT -6
Heard the game sheet was filled out improperly by the officials and Drake was told Draude wouldn’t be suspended by the refs afterwards. SHA are the real clowns in this situation. Has a 5min CFB always been a automatic suspension? I don’t always remember it being that way but I could be wrong What you heard is flat-out wrong. Game sheet was filled out properly, and none of the officials said anything about suspensions to Drake, I talked to one of the officials who worked the game. Drake is busy trying to scapegoat the officials and Hockey Sask for their mistake. Bottom line is this: one of your players gets a 5+GM for anything, quit asking the officials about suspensions. Talk to the league or Hockey Sask. This should be common knowledge by now, but every year it pops up again. |
|
|
|
Post by Login on Feb 25, 2022 10:51:31 GMT -6
Draude will most likely be suspended for playing ineligible regardless of whose fault no? Especially is Derek at sha is involved, that guy doesn’t take blame for anything.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gunit on Feb 25, 2022 10:54:40 GMT -6
Generally the only reason for the game to be replayed is if SHA took the blame. So they must have erred in some way. But if they did why is the coach and player suspended for 30 days…. Draude is suspended for 30 days? That’s effectively the rest of the season at this point. No, sorry the coach got the 30. |
|
|
|
Post by Gunit on Feb 25, 2022 10:59:53 GMT -6
Draude will most likely be suspended for playing ineligible regardless of whose fault no? Especially is Derek at sha is involved, that guy doesn’t take blame for anything. Yep, it’s the teams responsibility for knowing rules. If you played, and shouldn’t have, then you get suspended. Teams/players can’t claim ignorance. |
|
|
|
Post by Spenny on Feb 25, 2022 11:11:10 GMT -6
I have been involved a lot with minor hockey and even more years managing senior. Rule number one with penalties/suspensions as a manager, you are in charge of finding out for YOURSELF if you haven’t heard back from a member of your league or sha if I player is or isn’t suspended, especially if the thought even crossed your mind for a second that what happened could be remotely suspendible. Rule number 2, at least know the handbook a little bit. Not everyone should be expected to know it cover to cover I get that but in this case in particular, a 5 min major for cfb and with the player not returning to the game, is a HUGE red flag and drake should be held accountable for not following up or double and triple checking that in this case #9, was or wasn’t cleared to play especially in a nothing game from what I’ve been hearing.
|
|
|
|
Post by Richard Moranus on Feb 25, 2022 11:31:35 GMT -6
I have been involved a lot with minor hockey and even more years managing senior. Rule number one with penalties/suspensions as a manager, you are in charge of finding out for YOURSELF if you haven’t heard back from a member of your league or sha if I player is or isn’t suspended, especially if the thought even crossed your mind for a second that what happened could be remotely suspendible. Rule number 2, at least know the handbook a little bit. Not everyone should be expected to know it cover to cover I get that but in this case in particular, a 5 min major for cfb and with the player not returning to the game, is a HUGE red flag and drake should be held accountable for not following up or double and triple checking that in this case #9, was or wasn’t cleared to play especially in a nothing game from what I’ve been hearing. I agree. Also, Hockey Sask has this neat little app that has easy to find headings for the rules. One of them even says ‘Suspensions’ haha. And surely when you don’t know you could fire off a quick email to ask for clarification. The only thing I’m curious about is the decision to replay the game instead of a forfeit, would the the teams have had any say in that? |
|
|
|
Post by Rawdog on Feb 25, 2022 11:41:49 GMT -6
Agree it should have been a forfeit. Drake always seems to get favorable rulings from SHA, they love to play the ignorance card but at some point need to be held accountable and not just get a flick on the pee pee. Not the first time they have knowingly lied to sha and claimed ignorance. Just a few years ago with the whole spafford situation comes to mind. Not saying that they played 9 on purpose, but they seem to toe the line on the rules more often than not and act surprised when caught
|
|
